Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation

Artificial Intelligence 170 (2):114-159 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,170

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assumption-based argumentation for closed and consistent defeasible reasoning.Francesca Toni - 2008 - In Takashi Washio, Ken Satoh, Hideaki Takeda & Akihiro Inokuchi, New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 390--402.
On Mathematical Proving.Ioannis M. Vandoulakis & Petros Stefaneas - 2015 - Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 6 (1):130–149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
21 (#1,105,144)

6 months
2 (#1,359,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
Circumscription — A Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning.John McCarthy - 1980 - Artificial Intelligence 13 (1-2):27–39.
Semantic Considerations on nonmonotonic Logic.Robert C. Moore - 1985 - Artificial Intelligence 25 (1):75-94.
What is reasoning? What is an argument?Douglas N. Walton - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (8):399-419.

View all 14 references / Add more references