Staging Justice: Courtroom Semiotics and the Judicial Ideology in China

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 29 (3):595-614 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The right to a fair trial as a fundamental human right has been widely established in the international community. While the notion of a fair trial is typically associated with procedural safeguards, fairness can be reflected in spatial dimensions. Courtroom design, apart from achieving its main functional objectives, reflects the institutional ideology of how justice can be staged in public. In alignment with the perspective that courtroom as theatre consists of a sign system, this paper adopts a semiotic approach to the courtroom setting of Chinese criminal trials. With a thick description of space, mobility and attire, it attempts to probe into how judicial ideology is symbolically framed in the field. Drawing from ethnographic fieldwork of three courts, this paper discusses how courtroom space is constructed semiotically as a performative stage on which legal dramas unfold. Ultimately this paper argues that a semiotic investigation of Chinese courtrooms will shed light on an understanding of its judicial value, ideology of justice and dynamics of power relationship.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Silenced Interpreter: A Case Study of Language and Ideology in the Chinese Criminal Court.Biyu Du - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (3):507-524.
Interpreting the Scales of Justice : Architecture, Symbolism and Semiotics of the Supreme Court of India.Shailesh Kumar - 2017 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30 (4):637-675.
Strategies for Legitimising and Delegitimising Power in Nigerian Courtroom Discourse.Anthony Elisha Anowu, Tunde Ope-Davies & Mojisola Shodipe - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (2):379-398.
Judgments on Court Interpreting in Japan: Ideologies and Practice.Ikuko Nakane & Makiko Mizuno - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 32 (4):773-793.
Michał Dudek and Mateusz Stępień: Courtroom Power Distance Dynamics.Wei Yu - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (2):695-700.
Anne Wagner and Le Cheng (eds): Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control. [REVIEW]Letetia van der Poll - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (4):597-598.
In Pursuit of an Expert Identity: A Case Study of Experts in the Historical Courtroom. [REVIEW]Krisda Chaemsaithong - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (4):471-490.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-09

Downloads
22 (#972,197)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Interpreting the Scales of Justice : Architecture, Symbolism and Semiotics of the Supreme Court of India.Shailesh Kumar - 2017 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30 (4):637-675.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture.Philip Auslander - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (3):285-287.
The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama.Keir Elam - 1982 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (4):439-441.

Add more references