Should it be More Affective?

&
The Philosophers' Magazine 73:84-91 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1354814X

DOI

10.5840/tpm20167378

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Well read. [REVIEW]Alison Ainley - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 33 (33):89-89.
Well read. [REVIEW]Alison Ainley - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 33 (33):89-89.
You ought to read this — fact.Peter S. Fosl - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 36:85-85.
Read between the germ lines. [REVIEW]Adam Ferner - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 53 (53):110-111.
Read between the germ lines. [REVIEW]Adam Ferner - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 53 (53):110-111.
Crisp Read Not Run of the Mill. [REVIEW]Mike Targett - 1998 - The Philosophers' Magazine 2 (2):53-53.
Crisp Read Not Run of the Mill.Mike Targett - 1998 - The Philosophers' Magazine 2 (2):53-53.
I went. I met. I read.Jean Kazez - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 43:123-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
33 (#675,875)

6 months
9 (#455,691)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references