Superselection Rules for Philosophers

Erkenntnis 69 (3):377-414 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The overaraching goal of this paper is to elucidate the nature of superselection rules in a manner that is accessible to philosophers of science and that brings out the connections between superselection and some of the most fundamental interpretational issues in quantum physics. The formalism of von Neumann algebras is used to characterize three different senses of superselection rules (dubbed, weak, strong, and very strong) and to provide useful necessary and sufficient conditions for each sense. It is then shown how the Haag–Kastler algebraic approach to quantum physics holds the promise of a uniform and comprehensive account of the origin of superselection rules. Some of the challenges that must be met before this promise can be kept are discussed. The focus then turns to the role of superselection rules in solutions to the measurement problem and the emergence of classical properties. It is claimed that the role for “hard” superselection rules is limited, but “soft” (a.k.a. environmental) superselection rules or N. P. Landsman’s situational superselection rules may have a major role to play. Finally, an assessment is given of the recently revived attempts to deconstruct superselection rules.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Observation and superselection in quantum mechanics.N. P. Landsman - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (1):45-73.
Observation and superselection in quantum mechanics.N. P. Landsman - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (1):45-73.
Can superselection rules solve the measurement problem?Don Robinson - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):79-93.
Superselection Rules.Domenico Giulini - 2007 - In . pp. 771-779.
The trouble with superselection accounts of measurement.Mariam Thalos - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):518-544.
Environment-Induced Superselection Rules.W. H. Zurek - 1982 - \em Phys. Rev. D 26:1862–1880.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
196 (#125,968)

6 months
32 (#114,963)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Earman
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Infinite idealizations in physics.Elay Shech - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (9):e12514.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Interpreting the Quantum World.Jeffrey Bub - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):637-641.
Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics.Bernard D' Espagnat - 1976 - Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley, Advanced Book Program.
The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1992 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 54 (4):735-736.
Between classical and quantum.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2007 - Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 2:417--553.

View all 16 references / Add more references