- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is Incarceration Better than Neurointervention? On the Intended Harms of Prison
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):168-170 (2018)
Abstract
In “Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions”, Birks and Buyx (2018) provide a novel argument on why the use of mandatory neurointerventions on convicted criminals is morally objectionable “in a...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Punishment and Rehabilitation in the Use of Neurointerventions for Criminals.Nicole Martinez-Martin - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):152-153.
The Negative Effects of Neurointerventions: Confusing Constitution and Causation.Thomas Douglas & Hazem Zohny - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):162-164.
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Differences in the Interior Design of Prisons and Persons.Christoph Bublitz - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):170-172.
If Criminal Intentions Are Nonvoluntary, Mandatory Neurointerventions Might Be Permissible.Andrea Lavazza - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):154-156.
Can Neurointerventions Communicate Censure? (And So What If They Can’t?).David Birks - 2018 - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas, Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mandatory Neurointervention: A Lesser Evil Than Incarceration?Adam B. Shniderman & Lauren B. Solberg - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):148-149.
Mandatory Neurointerventions and the Risk of Racial Disparity.Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):156-157.
Mandatory Neurointerventions Could Enhance the Mental Integrity of Certain Criminal Offenders.Andrea C. Palk - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):150-152.
Neurointerventions: Punishment, Mental Integrity, and Intentions.Peter Vallentyne - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):131-132.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-09-22
Downloads
72 (#302,539)
6 months
9 (#328,796)
2018-09-22
Downloads
72 (#302,539)
6 months
9 (#328,796)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy.N. Stoljar - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.
Crimes Against Minds: On Mental Manipulations, Harms and a Human Right to Mental Self-Determination. [REVIEW]Jan Christoph Bublitz & Reinhard Merkel - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):51-77.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-f747c dc2