Is Incarceration Better than Neurointervention? On the Intended Harms of Prison

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):168-170 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions”, Birks and Buyx (2018) provide a novel argument on why the use of mandatory neurointerventions on convicted criminals is morally objectionable “in a...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2018.1496181

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,992

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Punishment and Rehabilitation in the Use of Neurointerventions for Criminals.Nicole Martinez-Martin - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):152-153.
The Negative Effects of Neurointerventions: Confusing Constitution and Causation.Thomas Douglas & Hazem Zohny - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):162-164.
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Differences in the Interior Design of Prisons and Persons.Christoph Bublitz - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):170-172.
If Criminal Intentions Are Nonvoluntary, Mandatory Neurointerventions Might Be Permissible.Andrea Lavazza - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):154-156.
Can Neurointerventions Communicate Censure? (And So What If They Can’t?).David Birks - 2018 - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas, Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mandatory Neurointervention: A Lesser Evil Than Incarceration?Adam B. Shniderman & Lauren B. Solberg - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):148-149.
Mandatory Neurointerventions and the Risk of Racial Disparity.Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):156-157.
Mandatory Neurointerventions Could Enhance the Mental Integrity of Certain Criminal Offenders.Andrea C. Palk - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):150-152.
Neurointerventions: Punishment, Mental Integrity, and Intentions.Peter Vallentyne - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):131-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-22

Downloads
72 (#311,534)

6 months
8 (#498,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy.N. Stoljar - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.

Add more references