Is Incarceration Better than Neurointervention? On the Intended Harms of Prison

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):168-170 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions”, Birks and Buyx (2018) provide a novel argument on why the use of mandatory neurointerventions on convicted criminals is morally objectionable “in a...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Punishment and Rehabilitation in the Use of Neurointerventions for Criminals.Nicole Martinez-Martin - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):152-153.
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Differences in the Interior Design of Prisons and Persons.Christoph Bublitz - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):170-172.
Mandatory Neurointervention: A Lesser Evil Than Incarceration?Adam B. Shniderman & Lauren B. Solberg - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):148-149.
Mandatory Neurointerventions and the Risk of Racial Disparity.Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):156-157.
Neurointerventions: Punishment, Mental Integrity, and Intentions.Peter Vallentyne - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):131-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-22

Downloads
72 (#302,539)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy.N. Stoljar - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.

Add more references