A fourth solution to a Victorian anthropology paradox: underdeterminism

Abstract

Historian of anthropology George Stocking tells us: from the point of view of parts of the Victorian middle class, Victorian society was highly evolved yet also contained savage components. Why don’t they change their ways, or why didn’t they? There is a Quinean solution.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-15

Downloads
224 (#115,683)

6 months
82 (#74,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two dogmas of empiricism.W. V. Quine - 1987 - In Paul K. Moser (ed.), A priori knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references