Composition and the cosmological argument

Mind 77 (305):115-117 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that not all arguments from parts to wholes commit the informal logical fallacy of composition,and especially not the cosmological argument for God which moves from the contingent existence of all the parts of the cosmos to the contingent existence of the whole.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Composition and the Cosmological Argument.L. Hughes Cox - 1974 - New Scholasticism 48 (3):365-370.
The Contingency Cosmological Argument.Mark T. Nelson - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 18–21.
An Argument for an Uncaused Cause.John R. T. Lamont - 1995 - The Thomist 59 (2):261-277.
Zeno's paradoxes and the cosmological argument.Jan Dejnozka - 1989 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25 (2):65 - 81.
Parts and Wholes.Meg Wallace - 2023 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Elements in Metaphysics).
The Cosmological Argument. [REVIEW]F. H. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 26 (4):765-765.
Metaphysical explanation and the cosmological argument.Thomas Oberle - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (6):1413-1432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
737 (#33,736)

6 months
88 (#70,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rem B. Edwards
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The fallacy of composition.William L. Rowe - 1962 - Mind 71 (281):87-92.

Add more references