Description of method

Abstract

Timothy Williamson objects that we do not have any reason to regard reflective equilibrium as a philosophical method, whether good or bad. In this paper, I propose a less demanding account of when a method is being described.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

On sociological description: A method from Marx. [REVIEW]Dorothy E. Smith - 1979 - Human Studies 4 (1):313 - 337.
Is reflective equilibrium a philosophical method? Is it a problem, if not?Terence Rajivan Edward - manuscript
Trespassing and reflective equilibrium.Terence Rajivan Edward - manuscript
The Methodological Irrelevance of Reflective Equilibrium.Tristram McPherson - 2015 - In Christopher Daly (ed.), Palgrave Handbook on Philosophical Methods. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 652-674.
From Description to Transformation.Leyla Sophie Gleissner - 2023 - Puncta 6 (2):81-98.
Introduction.Jussi Suikkanen - 2018 - In Jussi Suikkanen & Antti Kauppinen (eds.), Methodology and Moral Philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 1-20.
Précis of On evidence in philosophy.William G. Lycan - 2022 - Metaphilosophy 53 (5):569-572.
Reflective equilibrium and methodology of science.Elvio Baccarini - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):175 – 180.
In defense of reflective equilibrium.Kenneth Walden - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):243-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-30

Downloads
256 (#105,073)

6 months
49 (#101,667)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references