Naive response to Brighouse on neutrality

Abstract

This paper poses the question of whether there is any difference between neutrality of effect and neutrality of outcome, a distinction drawn by Harry Brighouse.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Neutral Political Concern.Joseph Raz - 1986 - In The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Evaluating school choice policies: A response to Harry Brighouse.Johannes Giesinger - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):589-596.
The argument against neutrality about the size of population.David Pomerenke - manuscript
What Is Neutrality?Roland Pierik & Wibren Van der Burg - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (4):496-515.
School choice and social injustice: A response to Harry Brighouse.Samara S. Foster - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 (2):291–308.
Flourishing children, flourishing adults: families, equality and the neutralism-perfectionism debate.Christine Sypnowich - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (3):314-332.
Toleration, neutrality, and exemption.Peter Jones - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (2):203-210.
Liberalism, Art, and Funding.Dale Francis Murray - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 38 (3):116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-09

Downloads
187 (#130,700)

6 months
1 (#1,889,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references