Traditional literary interpretation versus subversive interpretation

Asian Journal of Advances in Research 16 (3):34-39 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I present some objections to traditional literary interpretation and consider subversive interpretation as a solution to these problems. Subversive interpretation may seem more scientific and more democratic than traditional interpretation, but it is open to doubt that it is more democratic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-02

Downloads
1,850 (#7,446)

6 months
374 (#4,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Right and the Good. Some Problems in Ethics.William David Ross - 1930 - Oxford: Clarendon Press. Edited by Philip Stratton-Lake.
Limited Inc.Jacques Derrida - 1988 - Northwestern University Press.
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Fred Feldman & J. L. Mackie - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):134.
The Right and the Good.W. D. Ross - 1930 - Philosophy 6 (22):236-240.

View all 16 references / Add more references