Theories of government: possible, feasible, possibility-sensitive, feasibility-sensitive

Abstract

In this paper I make some distinctions, which I hope are of help for Laura Valentini and others. Are the recommendations of a theory of what the government should do possible and are they feasible? Is the project of the theorist possibility-sensitive and is the project feasibility-sensitive?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Justice for Jerks.Brian Carey - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (4):748-766.
Weak Kleene Logic and Topic-Sensitive Logics.Roberto Ciuni - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy.
Feasibility as Deliberation‐Worthiness.Nicholas Southwood - 2022 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 50 (1):121-162.
The limits of precaution.Sven Ove Hansson - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (2):293-306.
Defeasibility and Inferential Particularism.Javier González de Prado Salas - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (1):80-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-10

Downloads
243 (#106,597)

6 months
80 (#74,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

References found in this work

Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.Laura Valentini - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):654–664.
Presupposition.David I. Beaver - 1997 - In J. F. A. K. Van Benthem, Johan van Benthem & Alice G. B. Ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language. Elsevier.

Add more references