The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 4. Limits to Consent?

Research Ethics 6 (4):159-163 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is the fourth in a series of five papers on the role, remit and function of research ethics committees which are intended to provide for REC members a broad understanding of the most important issues in research ethics and governance. This paper explores the role of ethics committees in reviewing proposed conditions for recruiting human subjects and in checking the intended procedures for gaining consent. In so doing the paper will reiterate the conditions which are traditionally thought to make consent valid, identify a number of limitations to meeting these conditions, and show when consent, however broadly construed or indeterminately focused, may be unnecessary.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consent in Clinical Research.Collin O'Neill - 2017 - In Peter Schaber & Andreas Müller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 297-310.
The IRB's monitoring function: four concepts of monitoring.E. J. Heath - 1978 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 1 (5):103-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
33 (#662,452)

6 months
7 (#655,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sarah Edwards
State University of New York, Buffalo

References found in this work

Rethinking informed consent in bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Inducement in Research.Martin Wilkinson & Andrew Moore - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (5):373-389.

Add more references