Vexed adults? Simone de Beauvoir’s “One is not born a woman” and W.V. Quine

Abstract

This is a one page handout outlining an interpretation of Simone de Beauvoir which draws heavily upon material from the analytic tradition of philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Becoming Beauvoir: a life.Kate Kirkpatrick - 2019 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Paradoxes of femininity in the philosophy of Simone de beauvoir.Ulrika Björk - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):39-60.
Beauvoir and Merleau‐Ponty.Jennifer McWeeny - 2017 - In Laura Hengehold & Nancy Bauer (eds.), A Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 211–223.
Emancipated Beauty.Peg Zeglin Brand Weiser - 2009 - In Azoulay Marc Nouschi and Elisabeth (ed.), 100,000 Years of Beauty: Modernity/Globalisations (Volume 4 of 5). Gallimard. pp. 140-142.
Material Life: Bergsonian tendencies in Simone de Beauvoir’s philosophy.Alia Al-Saji - 2017 - In Emily Parker & Anne M. Van Leeuwen (eds.), Differences: Re-Reading Beauvoir and Irigaray. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 21-53.
Simone de Beauvoir on achieving subjectivity.Thomas Busch - 2005 - In Sally J. Scholz & Shannon M. Mussett (eds.), The Contradictions of Freedom: Philosophical Essays on Simone de Beauvoir's the Mandarins. State University of New York Press. pp. 177--188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-22

Downloads
426 (#67,501)

6 months
88 (#70,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Freedom from reason.Marcus G. Singer - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (2):253-261.

Add more references