Are these two views about new reproductive technologies contradictory?

IJRDO Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research 10 (3):2-3 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper responds to two seemingly contradictory views that Jeanette Edwards identifies in an article on the impact of new reproductive technologies in the northwest of England. I argue that they are probably not contradictory. But I do so by modifying how the views are formulated and reflect on the significance of this for anthropology at home.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intentionality and Realism.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2015 - Acta Analytica 30 (3):219-237.
Aristotle on Riddle.Mariana Gardella - 2022 - Ancient Philosophy 42 (1):233-249.
Protecting Humanity.Matti Häyry - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (2):211-222.
Protecting Humanity.Matti Häyry - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (2):211-222.
Pavel Florensky’s Theory of Religious Antinomies.Paweł Rojek - 2019 - Logica Universalis 13 (4):515-540.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-15

Downloads
163 (#143,124)

6 months
52 (#100,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anthropology in the context that produced it.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2014 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 6 (1):347-360.
The limits of auto-anthropology.Marilyn Strathern - 1987 - In Anthony Jackson (ed.), Anthropology at home. Routledge. pp. 59-67.

Add more references