The Game Is Not over Yet—Go in the Post-AlphaGo Era

Philosophies 5 (4):37 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The game of Go was the last great challenge for artificial intelligence in abstract board games. AlphaGo was the first system to reach supremacy, and subsequent implementations further improved the state of the art. As in chess, the fall of the human world champion did not lead to the end of the game. Now, we have renewed interest in the game due to new questions that emerged in this development. How far are we from perfect play? Can humans catch up? How compressible is Go knowledge? What is the computational complexity of a perfect player? How much energy is really needed to play the game optimally? Here, we investigate these and related questions with respect to the special properties of Go (meaningful draws and extreme combinatorial complexity). Since traditional board games have an important role in human culture, our analysis is relevant in a broader context. What happens in the game world could forecast our relationship with AI entities, their explainability, and usefulness.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-10

Downloads
15 (#1,213,741)

6 months
9 (#439,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Attila Egri-Nagy
Akita International University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references