Hacia una política de la discapacidad encarnada

Scientia et Fides 10 (1):219-238 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Towards a politics of embodied disability The political treatment of disability has received a new impulse during the second half of twentieth Century. Within this impulse, the so named “social model of disability” supports that disability is a social construct, derived from the oppression that a capitalist society exercises over a minority with impairments. Thus, the social model of disability establishes a radical dichotomy between impairment and disability which relegates our corporal condition to the shadow of the discussion. Soon, within the disability studies field grew critical voices alerting that the social model leads to a disembodied disability. In a different context of the disability studies, Alasdair Macintyre makes a suggestive proposal by radicalizing human being´s animal condition as well as his social dimension. It is worth exploring this line of inquiry to arrive to a truly embodied vision of disability.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The body politic: Theorising disability and impairment.Phillip Cole - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):169–176.
Mothers and Models of Disability.Gail Landsman - 2005 - Journal of Medical Humanities 26 (2-3):121-139.
On valuing impairment.Dana Howard & Sean Aas - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (5):1113-1133.
The social model of disability: A philosophical critique.Lorella Terzi - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):141–157.
The Minority Body: A Theory of Disability.Elizabeth Barnes - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Redefining disability: a rejoinder to a critique.Solveig Magnus Reindal - 2010 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):125-135.
Disability, Ideology, and Quality of Life: A Bias in Biomedical Ethics.Ron Amundson - 2005 - In David Wasserman, Jerome Bickenbach & Robert Wachbroit (eds.), Quality of Life and Human Difference: Genetic Testing, Health Care, and Disability. Cambridge University Press. pp. 101-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-03

Downloads
12 (#1,361,137)

6 months
3 (#1,469,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?