Learning to take play seriously: Peirce, Bateson, and Huizinga on the sacrality of play

Semiotica 2016 (212):259-276 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Name der Zeitschrift: Semiotica Jahrgang: 2016 Heft: 212 Seiten: 259-276.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-27

Downloads
61 (#349,636)

6 months
6 (#861,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How Can “The Play of Signs and The Signs of Play” Become an Attractive Model for Dealing with Eidetic and Empirical Research?William Gomes - 2017 - In Jamin Pelkey & Geoffrey Ross Owens Pelkey & Owens (ed.), Semiotics 2017: The Play of Musement. Puebla - Mexico: Semiotic Society of America. pp. 1-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Logic of the Sacred in Bateson and Peirce.Deborah Eicher-Catt - 2003 - American Journal of Semiotics 19 (1-4):95-126.

Add more references