On the Paradox of Gestalt Switches: Wittgenstein’s Response to Kohler

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (3) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wittgenstein formulates the paradox of gestalt switches thus: ‘What is incomprehensible is that nothing, and yet everything has changed, after all. That is the only way to put it’. In the course of isolating what I take to be the best of the various solutions to the paradox explored by Wittgenstein, the following claims are defended: (a) A significant strand in Wittgenstein’s own formulation of, and solution to, the paradox can best be understood as a response to three specific claims made by the Gestalt psychologist Kohler. (b) The most promising avenue Wittgenstein explored in his many attempts to resolve the paradox gives perceptual attention a constitutive role in the solution (c) This role is best elaborated, partially, by appeal to information processing theories of attention. (d) There are good reasons to think that the kind of solution to the paradox this yields would have been welcomed by Wittgenstein.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Saul Wittgenstein's skeptical paradox.Ronald Suter - 1986 - Philosophical Research Archives 12:183-193.
What is the Sceptical Solution?Alexander Miller - 2020 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 8 (2).
Kripke's Wittgensteinian Paradox.Barbara Caroline Scholz - 1990 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-17

Downloads
362 (#76,738)

6 months
131 (#36,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Naomi Eilan
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

VII—Naive Realism and Diaphaneity.Craig French - 2018 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (2):149-175.
Avner Baz on aspects and concepts: a critique.Reshef Agam-Segal - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (3):417-449.
Naïve realism and seeing aspects.Daniel E. Kalpokas - 2024 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 23 (4):761-776.
‘Blind’ to the obvious.Janette Dinishak - 2014 - History of the Human Sciences 27 (4):59-76.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations