Pinocchio against the dialetheists

Analysis 71 (2):306-308 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Semantic dialetheists astutely dodge Explosion, the logical contagion of everything being true if a single contradiction is true. A dialetheia is contained in their semantics, and sustained by a paraconsistent logic. Graham Priest has shown that this is a solution to the Liar paradox. I use the Pinocchio paradox, devised by Veronique Eldridge-Smith, as a counter-example. The Pinocchio paradox turns on the truth of Pinocchio, whose nose grows if and only if what he is saying is not true, saying ‘My nose is growing’. It is not just a matter of interpretation whether Pinocchio’s nose is and is not growing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pinocchio beards the Barber.Peter Eldridge-Smith - 2012 - Analysis 72 (4):749-752.
Dialetheists against Pinocchio.Jc Beall - 2011 - Analysis 71 (4):689-691.
The Blushing Liar.Franca D'Agostini & Elena Ficara - 2020 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy (Philippine e-journal) 21 (2):252-266.
Trivial Dialetheism and the Logic of Paradox.Jean-Yves Beziau - 2016 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (1):51-56.
The Liar Paradox and Bivalence.Douglas Steven Oro - 1988 - Dissertation, Brown University

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-30

Downloads
123 (#181,283)

6 months
12 (#218,371)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Eldridge-Smith
Australian National University

References found in this work

Reply to Oppy's fool.G. B. Matthews & L. R. Baker - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):303-303.

Add more references