What Words Can’t Say

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16 (1):2-15 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to survey the moral psychology of emoji, time-restricted messaging and other non-verbal elements of nominally textual computer-mediated communication. These features are increasingly common in interpersonal communication. Effects on both individual well-being and quality of intimate relationships are assessed. Results of this assessment are used to support ethical conclusions about these elements of digital communication. Design/methodology/approach Assessment of these non-verbal elements of CMC is framed in light of relevant literature from a variety of fields, including neuroscience, behavioral economics and social psychology. The resulting ethical analysis is informed by both Aristotelian and Buddhist virtue ethics. Findings This paper finds that emoji and other nonverbal elements of CMC have positive potential for individual well-being and interpersonal communication. They can be used to focus and direct attention, express and acknowledge difficult emotions and increase altruistic tendencies. Research limitations/implications This paper is conceptual, extrapolating from existing literature to investigate possibilities rather than reporting on novel experiments. It is not intended to substitute for empirical research on use patterns and their effects. But by identifying positive potential, it can help both users and designers to support individual and relational well-being. Practical implications The positive effects identified here can be incorporated into both design and use strategies for CMC. Social implications Situating ethical analysis of these trending technologies within literature from the social sciences on the effects of stylized faces, disappearing messages and directed attention can help us both understand their appeal to users and best practices for using them to enrich our social lives. Originality/value The paper uses empirically informed moral psychology to understand a deceptively trivial-looking phenomenon with wide-ranging impacts on human psychology and relationships.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical issues in relational maintenance via computer‐mediated communication.Kayla Hales - 2009 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 7 (1):9-24.
Gaming the gamer? – The ethics of exploiting psychological research in video games.Johnny Hartz Søraker - 2016 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 14 (2):106-123.
The state of the responsible research and innovation programme.George Inyila Ogoh & N. Ben Fairweather - 2019 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (2):145-166.
Building common ground in a wildly webbed world: a pattern language approach.John Charles Thomas - 2018 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16 (3):338-350.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-08

Downloads
52 (#444,062)

6 months
7 (#516,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexis Elder
University of Minnesota, Duluth

References found in this work

Flourishing on facebook: virtue friendship & new social media.Shannon Vallor - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (3):185-199.
Unreal friends.Dean Cocking & Steve Matthews - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (4):223-231.
Real friends: How the internet can Foster friendship. [REVIEW]Adam Briggle - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (1):71-79.
Complexity of the ephemeral – snap video chats.Ulrik Ekman - 2015 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 5 (1):97-101.

Add more references