The Genealogy of ‘∨’

Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):862-899 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of the symbol ∨for disjunction in formal logic is ubiquitous. Where did it come from? The paper details the evolution of the symbol ∨ in its historical and logical context. Some sources say that disjunction in its use as connecting propositions or formulas was introduced by Peano; others suggest that it originated as an abbreviation of the Latin word for “or,” vel. We show that the origin of the symbol ∨ for disjunction can be traced to Whitehead and Russell’s pre-Principia work in formal logic. Because of Principia’s influence, its notation was widely adopted by philosophers working in logic (the logical empiricists in the 1920s and 1930s, especially Carnap and early Quine). Hilbert’s adoption of ∨ in his Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik guaranteed its widespread use by mathematical logicians. The origins of other logical symbols are also discussed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The genealogy of disjunction.Raymond Earl Jennings - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Squaring the Circles: a Genealogy of Principia ’s Dot Notation.Landon D. C. Elkind - 2023 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 43 (1):42-65.
The Genealogy of Disjunction.Ernest W. Adams & R. E. Jennings - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (1):87.
What Does Disjunction do?R. E. Jennings - 1994 - In Raymond Earl Jennings (ed.), The genealogy of disjunction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dictionary of Logical Terms and Symbols.Carol Horn Greenstein - 1978 - New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
What is genealogy?Mark Bevir - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):263-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-10

Downloads
839 (#27,533)

6 months
218 (#13,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Landon D. C. Elkind
Western Kentucky University
Richard Zach
University of Calgary

References found in this work

The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (4):11-12.
Principia Mathematica.A. N. Whitehead & B. Russell - 1927 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 2 (1):73-75.
The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Studia Logica 15:308-310.

View all 78 references / Add more references