What does Peirce's Sign System Have to Say to Art History?

Culture, Theory, and Critique 44 (1):5-22 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peirce is far too strange for the uses to which he is put in art history. This is a plea to art historians for a moratorium on Peirce citations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-03

Downloads
871 (#26,433)

6 months
66 (#88,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Elkins
School of the Art Institute of Chicago

Citations of this work

Reading Allan Marquand’s “On Scientific Method in the Study of Art”.C. Oliver O’Donnell - 2016 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8 (2).
Photographing Sculpture: Aesthetic and Semiotic Issues.Francesca Polacci - 2018 - Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 11 (2):129-143.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (1):62-63.
Icon, index, and symbol.Arthur W. Burks - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (4):673-689.
Peirce's concept of sign.Douglas Greenlee - 1973 - The Hague,: Mouton.
Peirce’s Concept of Sign.Douglas Greenlee - 1973 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 10 (3):185-189.
Courbet's Realism.Michael Fried - 1990 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references