What economists (and everyone else) should think about utility theory

Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (1):95-104 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

08972346

DOI

10.5840/swphilreview200218111

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Comments on Ellis’ “What Economists (and Everyone Else) Should Think About Utility Theory”.Paul Weirich - 2002 - Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):117-120.
The Utility of Social Contract Theory.John Kultgen - 1985 - Southwest Philosophy Review 2:95-104.
The Utility of Social Contract Theory.John Kultgen - 1985 - Southwest Philosophy Review 2:95-104.
Bentham on Justifying the Principle of Utility.Arthur R. Miller - 1996 - Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (2):133-139.
Why Should We Care About the General Happiness?Richard W. Eggerrnan - 1988 - Southwest Philosophy Review 4 (1):79-85.
What Hylas Should Have Said to Philonous.Benjamin Hill - 2000 - Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (1):23-31.
Hume’s ethics: Acts, rules, dispositions and utility.Edward Shirley - 1991 - Southwest Philosophy Review 7 (1):129-139.
Why Pragmatists Should be Rawlsians.Robert B. Talisse - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):71-78.
What I Fear About Living Most Is Wasting My Time.John Casey - 2022 - Southwest Philosophy Review 38 (2):9-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
27 (#827,827)

6 months
8 (#591,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references