- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
New paradigm psychology of reasoning: An introduction to the special issue edited by Elqayam, Bonnefon, and Over
Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):249-265 (2013)
Abstract
No abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Cognitive unconscious and human rationality.Laura Macchi, Maria Bagassi & Riccardo Viale (eds.) - 2016 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Logic and Uncertainty in the Human Mind. A Tribute to David E. Over.I. Elqayam, Igor Douven, Jonathan Evans & N. Cruz (eds.) - forthcoming - Routledge.
Logic and uncertainty in the human mind: a tribute to David E. Over.S. Elqayam, Igor Douven, J. St B. T. Evans & N. Cruz (eds.) - 2020 - Routledge.
Epistemic normativity from the reasoner's viewpoint.Joëlle Proust - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):265-265.
Reason is normative, and should be studied accordingly.David Spurrett - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):267-268.
Truth-conduciveness as the primary epistemic justification of normative systems of reasoning.Gerhard Schurz - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):266-267.
Just the facts, and only the facts, about human rationality?Jeffrey Foss - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):254-255.
New ambitions for a new paradigm: Putting the psychology of reasoning at the service of humanity.Jean-François Bonnefon - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):381-398.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-17
Downloads
78 (#260,949)
6 months
10 (#361,262)
2013-11-17
Downloads
78 (#260,949)
6 months
10 (#361,262)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Indicative Conditionals: Probabilities and Relevance.Franz Berto & Aybüke Özgün - 2021 - Philosophical Studies (11):3697-3730.
Relevance and Reason Relations.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, Henrik Singmann & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S5):1202-1215.
Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Hannes Krahl & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2017 - Thinking and Reasoning 23 (4):449-482.
Bayesian reasoning with ifs and ands and ors.Nicole Cruz, Jean Baratgin, Mike Oaksford & David E. Over - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
References found in this work
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):645-665.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2