Introduction

Ratio 29 (4):353-356 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A brief, opinionated summary of the papers in the Ratio special edition on incommensurability and vagueness.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/rati.12152

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Richard Dietz - 2019 - In Vagueness and Rationality in Language Use and Cognition. Springer Verlag. pp. 1-3.
Introduction.Emma Borg, Sarah A. Fisher, Nat Hansen, Antonio Scarafone & Marat Shardimgaliev - 2020 - Ratio 33 (4):203-205.
Introduction.Wouter Kalf - 2019 - Ratio 32 (4):227-230.
Introduction.Charlotte Newey & Luke Elson - 2022 - Ratio 35 (4):249-250.
Introduction.Alexander D. Carruth & J. T. M. Miller - 2017 - Philosophica 92 (2).
Introduction.Shalini Sinha - 2018 - Ratio 31 (4):351-353.
Introduction.James M. Ambury, Tushar Irani & Kathleen Wallace - 2020 - Metaphilosophy 51 (2-3):161-165.
Introduction.Aleksander Peczenik - 2000 - Ratio Juris 13 (3):231-235.
Introduction.Beth Lord - 2018 - In Spinoza’s Philosophy of Ratio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 1-4.
Introduction.James Andow - 2017 - Ratio 30 (4):381-383.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-10

Downloads
57 (#371,717)

6 months
8 (#549,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luke Elson
University of Reading

Citations of this work

Indeterminacy and collective harms.Christine Tiefensee - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (11):3307-3324.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The possibility of parity.Ruth Chang - 2002 - Ethics 112 (4):659-688.

Add more references