Representationalism and Church's translation argument

Philosophical Studies 56 (2):107 - 125 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The moral of the new lilliputian argument.William G. Lycan - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 43 (March):277-80.
The Paradox of Translation.Roger Wertheimer - 2008 - In B. . Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & M. Thelen (eds.), Translation and Meaning. Hogeschool Zuyd.
Universals.George Bealer - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):5-32.
Lifting the church-ban on quotational analysis: The translation argument and the use-mention distinction. [REVIEW]Diederik Olders & Peter Sas - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):257-270.
Restrictions on representationalism.Amy Kind - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (3):405-427.
Translation and Belief Again.Arnold Cusmariu - 1983 - Analysis 43 (1):23-25.
Translation and belief.Arnold Cusmariu & Alonso Church - 1982 - Analysis 42 (1):12-16.
Church's thesis misconstrued.Jonathan Berg & Charles Chihara - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (5):357 - 362.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#444,482)

6 months
5 (#1,091,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Reinaldo Elugardo
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references