The End of Science?: Attack and Defense

Upa (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The title The End of Science? asks not whether science itself is about to end or even to wane, but whether people will stop claiming that science knows nature as it is. Science, it suggests, may know nature only as the scientist sees it. Or the title suggests that, in knowing nature, scientists to some extent create nature. No one bothers to ask philosophers or theologians, poets, or politicians, workers or bosses whether they know the world as it is. It is common knowledge that the world for which they speak has been affected already by their description of that world. Will not the same fate strike scientists now? Has it not already? This is the basic issue that the six distinguished contributors address. They include Sandra Harding, Sheldon Lee Glashow, Ian Hacking, Mary Hesse, Gerald Holton, and Gunther S. Stent. Co-published with the Nobel Conference

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Natural Religion. [REVIEW]Michael Liccione - 2007 - First Things 170:39-42.
Given time: biology, nature and photographic vision.Steve Garlick - 2009 - History of the Human Sciences 22 (5):81-101.
Understanding how science explains the world.Kevin McCain - 2022 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
The Problem of Science in Heidegger’s Thought.Daniel Videla - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 37:348-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
13 (#1,332,544)

6 months
3 (#1,486,845)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references