An Early Modern Scholastic Theory of Negative Entities: Thomas Compton Carleton on Lacks, Negations, and Privations

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):22-45 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Seventeenth century scholastics had a rich debate about the ontological status and nature of lacks, negations, and privations. Realists in this debate posit irreducible negative entities responsible for the non-existence of positive entities. One of the first scholastics to develop a realist position on negative entities was Thomas Compton Carleton. In this paper I explain Carleton's theory of negative entities, including what it is for something to be negative, how negative entities are individuated, whether they are abstract or concrete, and how they affect their subjects. I argue that for Carleton, negative entities are conceived as spatially extended simples that affect their subjects by means of spatial overlap. I also show how Carleton responds to some theological worries about his realism concerning negative entities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Negative Events.David Joshua Rosner - 1986 - Dissertation, Brown University
Making Sense of Negative Properties.David Hommen - 2017 - Axiomathes 28 (1):81-106.
Parmenides and the Ontological Difference (8th edition).Vasile Visotchi - 2023 - In Viorel Cernica (ed.), Studies in Pre-Judicative Hermeneutics And Meontology. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press. pp. 151-194.
Negative entities and negative facts in navya-nyāya.KennethJ Perszyk - 1984 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 12 (3):265-275.
Falsemakers: Something Negative about Facts.Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2014 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 90 (1):169-182.
Is Any Alleged Truthmaker for Negatives Explanatorily Deficient?Naoaki Kitamura - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):200-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-28

Downloads
1,449 (#11,175)

6 months
206 (#14,999)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Embry
University of Toronto, St. George Campus (PhD)

Citations of this work

Truth and Truthmakers in Early Modern Scholasticism.Brian Embry - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (2):196-216.
How Not To Be a Truthmaker Maximalist: Francisco Peinado on Truthmakers for Negative Truths.Brian Embry - 2013 - In Robert Pasnau (ed.), Oxford studies in medieval philosophy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 159-183.
Robert Greville on Sins, Privations, and Dialetheism.Patrick J. Connolly - 2023 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (3):578-596.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Being Positive About Negative Facts.Mark Jago & Stephen Barker - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138.
Theories of Location.Josh Parsons - 2008 - In Dean W. Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 201-232.
Does God Have a Nature?Alvin Plantinga - 1980 - Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Extended simples.Kris McDaniel - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):131 - 141.
Truthmakers for negative truths.George Molnar - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1):72 – 86.

View all 21 references / Add more references