Principle, Pragmatism, and Piecework in On Liberty

Utilitas:1-8 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a well-known passage in chapter V of On Liberty, J. S. Mill notes that while economic competition is generally socially beneficial and should be permitted, this “Free Trade” doctrine does not follow from the liberty or harm principle because “trade is a social act.” In a largely overlooked passage in chapter IV of the same essay, however, Mill contends that for society to coercively prohibit the practice of piecework – paying workers by the unit rather than by the hour or day – does violate this principle. In this short note, I demonstrate that Mill's reasoning in these two passages is contradictory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mill's Harm Principle as Social Justice.Huodong Li - 2004 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Mill and Modern Liberalism.Piers Norris Turner - 2016 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller, A Companion to Mill. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 567–582.
J. S. Mill's Re-Conceptualization of Liberty.Robert Allen Garmong - 2002 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Mill’s Circle(s) of Liberty.Sven Ove Hansson - 2015 - Social Theory and Practice 41 (4):734-749.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-27

Downloads
29 (#812,446)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references