Empiricism bad, knowledge good, understanding better?

Metascience:1-6 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11016-024-01019-y

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

If so, I beg to disagree. [REVIEW]Jan Faye - 2023 - Metascience 32 (1):115-119.
Understanding why we are confused. [REVIEW]Ingo Brigandt - 2024 - Metascience 33:89-90.
The nature of knowledge and human cognitive evolution.Jan Faye - 2024 - Metascience 33 (1):39-42.
Metascience builds connections.K. Brad Wray & Lori Nash - 2023 - Metascience 32 (1):1-2.
Instructions for Authors - Metascience.[author unknown] - 2004 - Metascience 12 (1):149-152.
Rules and conventions for metascience reviewers.[author unknown] - 1997 - Metascience 6 (2):3-3.
On the edges of science.Stéphanie Debray - forthcoming - Metascience:1-4.
Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2004 - Metascience 13 (3):275-422.
In Search of a 'Good Story' for the History of Medicine.Jonathan Simon - 2005 - Metascience 14 (3):427-429.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-07

Downloads
8 (#1,579,776)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Emmerson
University of Iceland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references