- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Species, taxonomy, and systematics
In Michael Ruse (ed.), Philosophy of biology. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. pp. 403--428 (1973)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Marc Ereshefsky, The Poverty of Linnaean Hierarchy. A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy.M. Capocci - 2002 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23 (2):303-303.
Marc Ereshefsky, The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy : A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001, 328 pages.Marc Ereshefsky, The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy : A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001, 328 pages. [REVIEW]Véronica Ponce - 2004 - Philosophiques 31 (1):271-275.
Marc Ereshefsky, ed., The Units of Evolution. Essays on the Nature of Species Reviewed by.Suzanne Cunningham - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13 (6):304-306.
Systematics and Taxonomy.Marc Ereshefsky - 2008 - In Sahorta Sarkar & Anya Plutynski (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell. pp. 99–118.
Marc Ereshefsky, ed., The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species Reviewed by.Pierre Blackburn - 1994 - Philosophy in Review 14 (2):92-94.
Marc Ereshefsky, The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press , 328 pp., $80.00. [REVIEW]Matthew H. Haber - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (3):491-494.
The species category as a scientific kind.Caleb C. Hazelwood - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 12):3027-3040.
Speciation without Species: A Final Word.W. Ford Doolittle - 2019 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 11.
Species, demes, and the omega taxonomy: Gilmour and the newsystematics. [REVIEW]Mary Pickard Winsor - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):349-388.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
112 (#191,112)
6 months
8 (#583,676)
2009-01-28
Downloads
112 (#191,112)
6 months
8 (#583,676)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Can Evolutionary Biology do Without Aristotelian Essentialism?Stephen J. Boulter - 2012 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70:83-103.
Zoocentrism in the weeds? Cultivating plant models for cognitive yield.Adam Linson & Paco Calvo - 2020 - Biology and Philosophy 35 (5):1-27.
Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence 2017.Vincent C. Müller (ed.) - 2017 - Berlin: Springer.
An Aristotelian Account of Evolution and the Contemporary Philosophy of Biology.Mariusz Tabaczek - 2014 - Dialogo 1 (1):57-69.
Artificial consciousness: from impossibility to multiplicity.Chuanfei Chin - 2017 - In Vincent C. Müller (ed.), Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence 2017. Berlin: Springer. pp. 3-18.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2