Sartre and Kierkegaard on the Aesthetics of Boredom

Idealistic Studies 34 (3):303-317 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyzes two inauthentic approaches to the problem of boredom from Sartre’s and Kierkegaard’s perpectives. I maintain that their narratives—Nausea and “The “Seducer’s Diary”—fit this problem perfectly, as it is through narratives that we appreciate and learn to avoid boredom. I also submit that their solutions are doomed to failure because they attempt to be the sole authors of their own stories, without making room for alterity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Significance of Boredom: A Sartrean Reading.Andreas Elpidorou - 2015 - In Daniel O. Dahlstrom, Andreas Elpidorou & Walter Hopp (eds.), Philosophy of Mind and Phenomenology: Conceptual and Empirical Approaches. New York: Routledge.
Boredom and Wonder in the Work of Arthur Schopenhauer.Luke Wadhams - 2019 - Idealistic Studies 49 (3):235-258.
Living with Boredom.Cheshire Calhoun - 2011 - Sophia 50 (2):269-279.
Temporality and Boredom.Victor Biceaga - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):135-153.
L'ennui ouvrier dans la pensée de Simone Weil. Cohérence du matériel et du spirituel.Judith Bordes - 2023 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 25 (1):205-227.
Really Boring Art.Andreas Elpidorou & John Gibson - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8 (30):190-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
157 (#146,877)

6 months
14 (#230,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Farhang Erfani
American University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references