Hume's antinomy and Kant's critical turn

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (4):617-640 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to confirm that it was Hamann's translation of Hume's "Treatise" (I.4.7) which triggered Kant's critical turn in 1768/69. If this is indeed so, then Kant's inaugural dissertation must be reassessed, in particular the doctrine, to be found there, that we have cognitive access to the intelligible world. This doctrine is part of a strategy for tackling the problem highlighted by Hume; that there may be conflicting principles at work in the human mind, i.e., an antinomy. The dissertation's strategy failed and so raised the question of how categories can refer to objects

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
90 (#234,004)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wolfgang Ertl
Keio University

References found in this work

Prolegomena to any future metaphysics.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy (16):507-508.
Kant's Transcendental Psychology.Ralf Meerbote & Patricia Kitcher - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (4):862.
Prolegomena, to Any Future Metaphysics.I. Kant & Peter G. Lucas - 1973 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 29 (1):97-97.

View all 28 references / Add more references