Finite Trees in Tense Logic

Studia Logica 62 (2):121-140 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we show the adequacy of tense logic with unary operators for dealing with finite trees. We prove that models on finite trees can be characterized by tense formulas, and describe an effective method to find an axiomatization of the theory of a given finite tree in tense logic. The strength of the characterization is shown by proving that adding the binary operators "Until" and "Since" to the language does not result in a better description than that given by unary tense logic; although the greater expressive power of "Until" and "Since" can be exploited by using the semantics of e-frames instead of traditional Kripke semantics

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#235,711)

6 months
8 (#549,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Properties of independently axiomatizable bimodal logics.Marcus Kracht & Frank Wolter - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1469-1485.
The structure of lattices of subframe logics.Frank Wolter - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 86 (1):47-100.
On some u,s-tense logics.Ming Xu - 1988 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (2):181 - 202.
Even more about the lattice of tense logics.Marcus Kracht - 1992 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (4):243-257.
A Distinguishable Model Theorem for the Minimal US-Tense Logic.Fabio Bellissima & Anna Bucalo - 1995 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (4):585-594.

View all 7 references / Add more references