Evidentialism as an Historical Theory

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (4):778-791 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to time-slice epistemology, what attitudes you should have at a time supervenes on features of you—like your evidence or mental states—at that time. Evidentialism is commonly assumed to b...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time-Slice Rationality.Brian Hedden - 2015 - Mind 124 (494):449-491.
Robust Justification.Jonathan Matheson - 2020 - In Scott Stapleford & Kevin McCain (eds.), Epistemic Duties: New Arguments, New Angles. New York: Routledge.
Time-Slice Epistemology and Action Under Indeterminacy.Sarah Moss - 2005 - In Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 172--94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-18

Downloads
139 (#160,768)

6 months
24 (#129,611)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Fantl
University of Calgary

Citations of this work

How to combine evidentialism with knowledge-first epistemology.Giada Fratantonio - forthcoming - In Scott Stapleford, Kevin McCain & Matthias Steup (eds.), Evidentialism at 40: New Arguments, New Angles. Routledge.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What evidence do you have?Ram Neta - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (1):89-119.

Add more references