The Non-plurality of the I: On the Question of the Ultimate Subject of Experience

Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (1-2):140-157 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his contribution to this special issue, Almaas is keen to distinguish the individual streams of consciousness from 'pure awareness'. Since the existence of the former is presumably quite uncontroversial in present-day philosophy, I wish to concentrate on the latter, in particular on Almaas's claim that pure awareness is non-individual and ultimately it is 'the true owner of all experiences of all streams'. In my contribution, I wish to make plausible, by a philosophical reflection on the puzzling nature of the I, that the ultimate subject of experience is indeed not the individual but 'the pure ego of the universe'.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personality and Liberty.Olaf Stapledon - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (89):144 - 156.
Experience, Self, and Individual Consciousness.A. H. Almaas - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (1-2):14-31.
Pure awareness experience.Brentyn J. Ramm - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (3):394-416.
What Do Powers Do When They Are Not Manifested?Stathis Psillos - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (1):137-156.
The First Person Perspective and Beyond: Commentary on Almaas.Simon Hoffding & Joel Krueger - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (1-2):158-178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-22

Downloads
33 (#685,336)

6 months
14 (#229,302)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references