Holding back from theory: limits and methodological alternatives of randomized field experiments in development economics

Journal of Economic Methodology 27 (3):191-211 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we critically and constructively examine the methodology of evidence-based development economics, which deploys randomized field experiments as its main tool. We describe the...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Field Experiments, Social Networks, and Development.Emily Breza - 2016 - In Bramoullé Yann, Andrea Galeotti & Brian Rogers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks. Oxford University Press USA.
Orthodox and heterodox economics in recent economic methodology.D. Wade Hands - 2015 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):61.
What is the standard of care in experimental development economics?Marcos Picchio - 2024 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 23 (2):205-226.
Field experiments and methodological intolerance: reply.Glenn W. Harrison - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (2):157-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-11

Downloads
63 (#324,516)

6 months
11 (#305,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michiru Nagatsu
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Assessing the Overall Validity of Randomised Controlled Trials.Alexander Krauss - 2021 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):159-182.

Add more citations