Normative organization and empirical fields

Philosophy of Science 12 (2):52-56 (1945)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We must begin by distinguishing between sciences and empirical fields. The empirical fields are the elementary divisions of the natural world into levels for purposes of examination. The sciences consist in the method of examining those fields, together with the presuppositions and findings of such a method. Throughout this essay, we shall consider only the empirical fields as the subject-matter of the sciences, and the way in which the sciences describe their subject-matter, but not the sciences themselves. Thus the adjective “physical” will be employed, for instance, to describe the physical empirical field, and not “physics” to describe the science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Physical science and the social sciences.Irving P. Orens - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):90-95.
Mathematics and its applications in the sciences.James K. Feibleman - 1956 - Philosophy of Science 23 (3):204-215.
Physics and the problem of historico-sociological laws.Edgar Zilsel - 1941 - Philosophy of Science 8 (4):567-579.
Metaphysics and History.Wilbur M. Urban - 1950 - Review of Metaphysics 3 (3):263 - 299.
Comte's Positivism and the Science of Society.H. B. Acton - 1951 - Philosophy 26 (99):291 - 310.
What science really means.Julius Weis Friend - 1937 - London,: G. Allen & Unwin. Edited by James Kern Feibleman.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#710,849)

6 months
11 (#356,365)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references