Why Be regular?, part I

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65 (C):122-132 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why be regular? Part II.Benjamin Feintzeig & James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65 (C):133-144.
Why the quantum?Jeffrey Bub - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):241-266.
Why geophysics?N. Oreskes, Fleming &unknown & R. J. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (3):253-257.
Why Geophysics?Naomi Oreskes & James R. Fleming - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (3):253-257.
Why geophysics?Naomi Oreskes & James R. Fleming - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (3):253-257.
James T. Cushing, 1937–2002.Michael Dickson - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (3):601-603.
Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:ii.
Models and the dynamics of theory-building in physics. Part I—Modeling strategies.Gérard G. Emch - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):558-585.
Models and the dynamics of theory-building in physics. Part I—Modeling strategies.Gérard G. Emch - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):558-585.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-17

Downloads
66 (#315,561)

6 months
9 (#451,423)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Benjamin Feintzeig
University of Washington
Jb Manchak
University of California, Irvine
Sarita Rosenstock
University of Melbourne
1 more

Citations of this work

Einstein Completeness as Categoricity.Iulian D. Toader - 2023 - Foundations of Physics 53 (2):1-15.
Reductive Explanation and the Construction of Quantum Theories.Benjamin H. Feintzeig - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (2):457-486.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Similarity, Topology, and Physical Significance in Relativity Theory.Samuel C. Fletcher - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):365-389.
Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent Particle Concepts in Quantum Field Theory.Rob Clifton & Hans Halvorson - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):417-470.
Probability and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.Arthur Fine - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1-37.
Whence the eigenstate–eigenvalue link?Marian J. R. Gilton - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55:92-100.
Toward an Understanding of Parochial Observables.Benjamin Feintzeig - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (1):161-191.

View all 12 references / Add more references