Frege pipes up

Analysis (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Martone has recently built a case aimed at showing that any attempt to exploit the ingredients of the semantic machinery of demonstratives to solve Frege’s Puzzle seems hopeless. In this reply, I show that Martone’s case seems unable to shatter our hopes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,634

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Frege’s Puzzle and Semantic Relationism.Surajit Barua - 2019 - Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 36 (1):197-210.
Eliciting and Conveying Information.Heimir Geirsson - 2020 - In Heimir Geirsson & Stephen Biggs, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference. New York: Routledge. pp. 153-166.
Frege’s puzzle is about identity after all.Elmar Unnsteinsson - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (3):628-643.
Can Frege pose Frege's puzzle?Stavroula Glezakos - 2009 - In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi, The philosophy of David Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-27

Downloads
22 (#1,046,814)

6 months
22 (#136,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giulia Felappi
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 1948 - Philosophical Review 57 (3):209-230.

Add more references