Newtons Methodologie: Eine Kritik an Duhem, Feyerabend und Lakatos

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 101 (4):584-615 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Newtonian research program consists of the core axioms of the Principia Mathematica, a sequence of force laws and auxiliary hypotheses, and a set of methodological rules. The latter underwent several changes and so it is sometimes claimed that, historically seen, Newton and the Newtonians added methodological rules post constructione in order to further support their research agenda. An argument of Duhem, Feyerabend, and Lakatos aims to provide a theoretical reason why Newton could not have come up with his theory of the Principia in accordance with his own methodology: Since Newton’s starting point, Kepler’s laws, contradict the law of universal gravitation, he could not have applied the so-called method of analysis and synthesis. In this paper, this argument is examined with reference to the Principia’s several editions. Newton’s method is characterized, and necessary general background assumptions of the argument are made explicit. Finally, the argument is criticized based on a contemporary philosophy of science point of view.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The argument(s) for universal gravitation.Steffen Ducheyne - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):419-447.
The Laws of Motion from Newton to Kant.Eric Watkins - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (3):311-348.
Newton's Regulae Philosophandi.Zvi Biener - 2018 - In Chris Smeenk & Eric Schliesser, Oxford Handbook of Isaac Newton. Oxford University Press.
Who’s the greatest of them all?Steffen Ducheyne - 2021 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 113 (1):3-24.
Carnap and Newton: Two Approaches to the Method of Theory Construction (Part II).Igor Hanzel - 2009 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 16 (3):304-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-09

Downloads
29 (#812,446)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references