- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of paradoxes afflicting various voting procedures where one out of m candidates (m ≥ 2) must be elected [Book Review]
Abstract
The paper surveys 17 deterministic electoral procedures for selecting one out of two or more candidates, as well as the susceptibility of each of these procedures to various paradoxes. A detailed appendix exemplifies the paradoxes to which each electoral procedure is susceptible. It is concluded that from the perspective of vulnerability to serious paradoxes, as well as in light of additional technical criteria, Copeland’s or Kemeny’s proposed procedures are the most desirable.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Monotonicity Failures Afflicting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate.Dan S. Felsenthal - 2017 - Cham: Imprint: Springer. Edited by Hannu Nurmi.
Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate: Proving Their (in)Vulnerability to Various Voting Paradoxes.Dan S. Felsenthal & Hannu Nurmi - 2018 - Springer Verlag.
Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain: An Examination of the (in)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes.Dan S. Felsenthal & Hannu Nurmi - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Resolving Paradoxes In Judgment Aggregation.Davide Rizza - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):337-354.
Voting Procedures for Complex Collective Decisions. An Epistemic Perspective.Luc Bovens & Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (2):241-258.
Complex collective decisions: an epistemic perspective.Luc Bovens & Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2004 - Associations: Journal for Social and Legal Theory 7 (X).
De doctrinale paradox.Luc Bovens & Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2005 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 97 (1):XX.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-07-25
Downloads
46 (#482,869)
6 months
12 (#302,973)
2010-07-25
Downloads
46 (#482,869)
6 months
12 (#302,973)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No-show paradox in Slovak party-list proportional system.Vladimír Dančišin - 2017 - Human Affairs 27 (1):15-21.
References found in this work
A Comparison of Some Distance-Based Choice Rules in Ranking Environments.Hannu Nurmi - 2004 - Theory and Decision 57 (1):5-24.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2