The Responsibility to Be Hard: Comments on Ken Gemes's "The Biology of Evil"

Journal of Nietzsche Studies 52 (1):26-39 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I show that attending to Nietzsche's views about breeding and human enhancement reveals two important ways in which Ken Gemes's account of Nietzsche's uses of the rhetoric of degeneration and Verjüdung must be modified. First, attending to Nietzsche's views about breeding reveals that methods like isolation, quarantine, excision, and extermination are not merely for the weak, as Gemes claims. In fact, for Nietzsche such methods are crucial for producing and maintaining healthy, strong people and societies. More generally, such methods play a vital role in Nietzsche's philosophy, including with respect to his conception of health. Second, contrary to Gemes's claim that Nietzsche was not interested in the actual Jews of his time, I show that Nietzsche was very interested in them, and thought they were important precisely for their relevance to his interest in breeding a new European aristocracy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-20

Downloads
55 (#385,488)

6 months
12 (#274,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leonard Feldblyum
University of Alabama

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references