Why generalisability is not generalisable

Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (4):437–449 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the United States there is an increasing tendency to view the only educational research worthy of federal funding as that which is designed as an experiment using randomised controls. One of the foundational assumptions underlying this research design is that the results of such research are meant to be generalisable beyond any particular research study. The purpose of this paper is to historicise the assumption of generalisability by explaining the ways in which it is a particularly modern research project. By historicising generalisability, I show the ways in which the current research standards are products of culturally specific historical circumstances. In other words, generalisability is a local phenomenon and not generalisable to other times and places.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#456,638)

6 months
27 (#121,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Lure of Psychology for Education and Educational Research.Paul Smeyers & Marc Depaepe - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (3):315-331.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The taming of chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
An enquiry concerning human understanding.David Hume - 2000 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 112.
Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Donald Thomas Campbell - 1966 - Chicago,: R. McNally. Edited by Julian C. Stanley & N. L. Gage.
An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic.Ian Hacking - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references