A critique of Habermas's consensus theory of truth

Philosophy and Social Criticism 13 (1):39-67 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who is the ‘communis’ in sensus communis? A response to Ferrara.Lois McNay - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (2):159-167.
Truth, lies and tweets: A Consensus Theory of Post-Truth.Vittorio Bufacchi - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (3):347-361.
Alessandro Ferrara: Reflective Authenticity.Marek Hrubec - 2000 - Filosoficky Casopis 48:155-157.
Is Habermas’s Consensus Theory A Theory of Truth?Paul Healy - 1987 - Irish Philosophical Journal 4 (1/2):145-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
187 (#130,215)

6 months
5 (#1,038,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alessandro Ferrara
Università degli Studi "Tor Vergata" (Roma)

Citations of this work

Truth, lies and tweets: A Consensus Theory of Post-Truth.Vittorio Bufacchi - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (3):347-361.
Futher reflections on semantic minimalism: Reply to Wedgwood.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 437-474..
Did Habermas Cede Nature to the Positivists?Gordon R. Mitchell - 2003 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 36 (1):1-21.
Immunity to error through misidentification, 'de se', and pragmatics.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 413-437..

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references