Abstract

Prethodno, u izlaganju »Petrić i Acastos«, održanom na simpoziju Petrić i renesansne filozofske tradicije 2008. godine, ustanovili smo da je Petrić najbliži platonovsko-novoplatonovsko- pitagorovskom izvorniku, ali je pridonio raščinjavanju klasične etičke vrline , da je vrlo blizak drugom modelu za uspoređivanje, Acastosu I i donekle se približava Acastosu II .S istim trima modelima sada prelazimo na usporedbu u odnosu na pjesničko umijeće, kako je izloženo u petnaest izabranih Petrićevih tekstova u knjizi Ljerke Schiffler Frane Petrić o pjesničkom umijeću . Pitat ćemo se koliko se u navedenoj usporedbi otkrilo, manje ili više, bliskosti s prethodnim zaključcima.Dakako, usput će se pokušati ustanoviti je li Petrićeva poetika samo obrana Platonove linije ili sadržava i neke elemente aristotelizma, što ga ne bi povezalo samo s barokom i manirizmom nego i s modernom estetikom.The author established on the occasion of the previous presentation “Petrić and Acastos” given at the symposium Petrić and Renaissance Philosophical Traditions, held in 2008, that Petrić was closest to the Platonist-Neoplatonist-Pythagorean original, but also that he contributed to the disintegration of classical ethical virtue and that there were two more comparative models he came close to – that of Acastos I and to some extent that of Acastos II .Retaining the three models, the author now deals with the comparison in relation to poetic art as it is outlined in the fifteen selected Petrić’s texts in the book by Ljerka Schiffler entitled Frane Petrić o pjesničkom umijeću . The author will look into the degree to which the mentioned comparison revealed connections with previous conclusions.Needless to say, the author will along the way try to determine whether Petrić’s poetics presents merely a defence of Plato’s attitude or it contains some elements of Aristotelianism, which would connect Petrić with not only Baroque and Mannerism but also modernist aesthetics