Legal But Rare

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (2):203-220 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that it is not incoherent to think that abortion should be “legal but rare.” The argument draws upon virtue ethics, feminism, critical theory, and the theory of biopolitics to argue that the idea that abortion should be legal but rare is best understood as aiming at the elimination of unwanted pregnancies. Some pro-choice defenders of abortion rights worry that the “legal but rare” idea stigmatizes women who choose abortion. But when this idea is unpacked using the tools of intersectional analysis, biopolitical theory, and virtue ethics it can be understood as pointing toward a transformation of social reality that empowers women.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-16

Downloads
55 (#394,763)

6 months
8 (#600,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Fiala
California State University, Fresno

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references