Cycles of maximin and utilitarian policies under the veil of ignorance

Mind and Society 15 (1):105-116 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A conceptual and mathematical model of a social community behavior in a choice situation under a veil of ignorance, where two alternative policies—Rawlsian maximin and Harsanyian utilitarianism—can be implemented through the aggregation of individual preferences over these two policies, is constructed and investigated. We first incorporate in our conceptual model psychological features such as risk-aversion and prosocial preferences that likely underlie choices of welfare policies. We secondly develop and select the mathematical model presented it by means of an autonomous system of ordinary differential equations. A qualitative analysis of this system global phase-plane behavior shows possible tendencies of community development under social choices over Rawlsian or utilitarian societies depending on psychological parameters such as risk aversion and prosocial preferences.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A dual system model of preferences under risk.Kanchan Mukherjee - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (1):243-255.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
29 (#778,198)

6 months
7 (#718,806)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde
Institut Jean Nicod
Jean Baratgin
Université Paris 8 (Alumnus)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):331-340.
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.

View all 7 references / Add more references