An I3 Theory analysis of human sex differences in aggression

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):279-279 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to I3 Theory, individuals enact aggressive behaviors when (a) instigating triggers are severe, (b) impelling forces are strong, and/or (c) inhibiting forces are weak. Archer's analysis of human sex differences in aggression could be bolstered by a careful analysis of male-female discrepancies in reactivity (or exposure) to instigating triggers, proneness toward impelling forces, and/or proneness toward inhibiting forces

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sex differences in dream aggression.Michael Schredl - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):287-288.
Sex differences in the developmental antecedents of aggression.Joseph M. Boden - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):269-270.
Some reflections on sex differences in aggression and violence.Stephen C. Maxson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):232-233.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
52 (#411,297)

6 months
7 (#669,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references