Brentano and J. Stuart Mill on Phenomenalism and Mental Monism

In Denis Fisette, Guillaume Fréchette & Friedrich Stadler, Franz Brentano and Austrian Philosophy. New York: Springer. pp. 251-267 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study is about Brentano’s criticism of a version of phenomenalism that he calls “mental monism” and which he attributes to positivist philosophers such as Ernst Mach and John Stuart Mill. I am interested in Brentano’s criticism of Mill’s version of mental monism based on the idea of “permanent possibilities of sensation.” Brentano claims that this form of monism is characterized by the identification of the class of physical phenomena with that of mental phenomena, and it commits itself to a form of idealism. Brentano argues instead for a form of indirect or hypothetical realism based on intentional correlations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Natural Classes in Brentano's Psychology.Arnaud Dewalque - 2018 - Brentano‐Studien: Internationales Jahrbuch der Franz Brentano Forschung 16:111-142.
Brentano's Latter-day Monism.Uriah Kriegel - 2016 - Brentano Studien 14:69-77.
Brentano on the Characteristics of Sensation.Hamid Taieb - 2021 - In Thomas Binder & Mauro Antonelli, The Philosophy of Franz Brentano. Brill. pp. 192-208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
894 (#26,863)

6 months
155 (#29,391)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?